Labels: Albert Kim, HuffingtonPost.com, journalists, residuals, salaries, WGA
Follow up to Sour Grapes
I'm feeling that maybe I wasn't just being a complainer when I said I wasn't that sympathetic to the WGA's plight. Here's Albert Kim's take on HuffingtonPost.com. His answer as to why journalists don't get paid residuals: We get paid a salary. I'm not so sure that having job stability should translate into our content being constantly repurposed for free so that others may boost revenue. How does anyone else feel about this?
